Joint Fire Science Program Regional Fire Consortia

Regional fire consortia serve as a link between regional stakeholders, managers, practitioners, and scientists.  The consortia are funded through the Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP), a federally funded program designed to address the emerging fire science needs of policymakers and fire managers. 

As a part of their mission, the JFSP has invested significant resources into science delivery.  Specifically, JFSP has established 14 regional fire consortia to promote fire science acess to managers and to support communication between managers and researchers.  The program adopted a regional approach to fire science delivery because research and information needs vary across the nation.  Collectively, the consortia represent a collaborative effort, but each group works independently of one another to focus on the specific needs of their region.  The consortia promote fire science distribution through many different methods including: creating websites, publishing newsletters, sponsoring conferences, organizing field days, sponsoring webinars, and through social media (Facebook and Twitter).  The 14 regional consortia are: Alaska, Appalachians, California, Great Basin, Great Plains, Lake States, Oak Woodlands, Northern Rockies, Northwest, Pacific, South, Southern Rockies, Southwest, and Tallgrass (see figure below).  Below is a summary(and link) to each of the 14 regional consortia, synopsis was taken from the website of each consortia.

 

 

The primary purpose of the Alaska Fire Science Consortium is to strengthen the link between managers and scientists, providing an organized fire science delivery platform, and facilitating collaborative scientist-manager research development.

The primary objective of the Consortium of Appalachian Fire Managers and Scientists (CAFMS) is to form a widening network of fire managers and scientists to facilitate knowledge exchange among managers and scientists.  CAFMS includes fire managers along with goverment and university scientists throught the Appalachian region which stretches from Pennsylvania to Alabama.

 The primary goals of the California Fire Science Consortium are: 1) To become a clearinghouse for fire science resources in California, and 2) To encourage collaboration between fire researchers, land managers, and other stakeholders.

The goals of the Great Basin Fire Science Delivery Project are: 1) Provide a forum where Great Basin land managers can identify technical needs with respect to fire, fuels, and post-fire vegetation management, 2) Develop/synthesize the necessary information and technical tools to meet these needs, and 3) Provide the necessary information and tools through venues most preferred by field staff, field office managers, and higher administrative levels.

 

The Great Plains Fire Science Exchange is a network of landowners, managers, practitioners, and scientists interested in the fire-dependent grassland ecosystems of the Great Plains region.  Their mission to assist land managers and the fire community to make sound decisions based on the best possible information.

.

 

 

 

The mission of the Lake States Fire Science Consortium is to accelerate the awareness, understanding, and adoption of wildland fire science information by federal, tribal, state, local, and private stakeholders across the Lake States from Minnesota to New York, and the adjacent Canadian provinces of Ontario and Manitoba.  This Consortium aims to link managers, scientists, policymakers, and disciplines by providing information and tools to support management of fire-dependent ecosystems in the Lake States region.

The mission of the Oak Woodlands and Forests Fire Consortium is to provide fire science information to resource managers, landowners, and the public about the use, application, and effects of fire.  Fire science dissemination efforts include workshops, symposiums, newsletters, and literature syntheses focusing on topics identified by regional fire practitioners as areas needing credible and accessible science information.

The Northern Rockies Fire Science Network seeks to enhance communication between managers and scientists about fire management issues and research products.  The Northern Rockies Fire Science Network aims to facilitate interactions between managers and scientists; identify fire and research needs; and improve access to knowledge and tools to serve those needs.

The Northwest Fire Science Consortium seeks to provide: 1) A delivery system for the effective dissemination and adoption of fire science information, knowledge, tools, and expertise; 2)  A framework within which a variety of existing organizations and outreach programs focused on fire science delivery can coordinate more effectively; and 3) A venue to increase researcher understanding of the fire science needs of practitioners.

The Pacific Fire Exchange represents Hawaii and the U.S. affiliated islands in the Pacific.  Their vision is a reduced threat to ecosystems and communities in the Pacific from wildfire.  Their mission is to facilitate fire knowledge exchange and enable collaborative relationships among Pacific stakeholders including resource managers, fire responders, researchers, landowners, and communities.

The Southern Fire Exchange represents 11 southern states and is building on the long history of fire science deliver and outreach that already exists in the South.  Their mission is to increase the availability and application of fire science information for natural resource management and to serve as a conduit for fire managers to share new research needs with the research community.

The Southern Rockies Fire Science Network is user driven, which means scientists and those who use and benefit from science will work together to answer important questions through collaboration that involves face-to-face communications and use of technology. Through such tools as workshops, field trips, webinars and web-based communication, collaborative processes can draw together disparate research and resource-management cultures to address complex wildland fire issues.

The Southwest Fire Science Consortium is a way for managers, scientists, and policy makers to more effectively interact and share science. The Southwest is one of the most fire-dominated regions of the US, but limited in terms of organizations focused on fire research and information dissemination. In the Southwest there are many localized efforts to develop scientific information and to disseminate that to practitioners on the ground, but these initiatives are often not well coordinated or aware of all the information and resources that are available. The real need for a consortium is to help bring these parallel efforts together to be more efficient and inclusive.

The Tallgrass Prairie and Oak Savanna Fire Science Consortium is comprised of fire practitioners, scientist, outreach and extension specialists, volunteers, educators and enthusiasts from the region.  They are dedicated to fire science outreach through webinars, discussions, and field trips all to foster fire knowledge sharing.

Setting Prescribed Fire Objectives

Prescribed fire is an effective tool for managing vegetation.  Prescribed fire can be used to improve forage for livestock and wildlife, control both non-native and native invasive species, remove leaf litter, reduce logging debris, improve tree regeneration, and manage vegetation competion. Fire is an excellent tool for vegetation management, but prescribed fires need to be planned to consistently achieve the beneficial effects. 

 

A successful prescribed fire program involves three steps:

1) planning-including evaluating the condition of vegetation and vegetation management goals

2) safe and effective prescribed fire execution

3) sound vegetation management pre-, during, and post-prescribed fire treatment. A prescribed fire plan is an essential part of the process for preparing to use prescribed fire. 

The prescribed fire plan includes prescribed fire objectives, weather conditions, plans for fire control, identification of authorities to notify prior to prescribed fire ignition, prescribed fire ignition plans, and post-prescribed fire plans. Below are links to sites with information on prescribed fire planning:  Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Florida Forest Service, U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station, Georgia Forestry Commission, New Hampshire Prescribed Fire Council, and Oklahoma State University.     

Determining Land Management Objectives

Planning to use prescribed fire starts with determining what the land management objectives are and deciding if prescribed fire will help achieve the objectives.  This process can take some time, but it is very important for determining where, when, and how prescribed fire can be used.  Once it is determined that prescribed fire is an appropriate tool to meet the objectives, then a prescribed fire plan should be prepared.  The prescribed fire plan is a document that describes the area to be treated with fire, the prescribed fire objectives, and a plan that includes a combination of prescribed fire ignition techniques, season of burn, and weather conditions to meet the defined objectives.  Setting the objectives of the prescribed fire is a very important step in prescribed fire use.

Prescribed fire objectives need to provide enough detail that the prescribed fire can be evaluated to determine if it was successful.  Objectives can be both short- and long-term.  Short-term objectives should be quantifiable. 

Short-Term Objectives

  • Reduce leaf litter by 70%
  • Reduce understory shrubs by 50%
  • Consume 60% of tree branches less than 1inch in diameter from logging debris.
  • Consume 90% of fine fuels.
  • Increase grass cover by 20%
  • Increase native plant species richness by 5 species.

Long-Term Objectives

Long-term objectives can include the desired future conditions that the landowner is trying to achieve by using prescribed fire.  Examples of long-term objectives are:

  • Promote native grasses.
  • Reduce the cover of exotic species
  • Restore woodland structure
  • Convert site from hardwoods to softwoods
  • Improve forage for livestock

     

       

Additional Literature:    

Fire in southern forests: http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/6462

Fire in Ponderosa Pine Forests in the Pacific Northwest: http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/21805

Prescribed fire effects literature review and synthesis: http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/33628

What is Patch Burning?

What is Patch Burning?

Patch burning (patch-burn grazing) involves the combined use of fire and grazing for ecological or agricultural goals within landscapes or pastures.  The target area or pasture is subdivided using only needed burn lines (no cross fencing).  Each year fire is used to burn a different portion of the pasture.  Livestock can be added to the area at anytime.  The grazers will be attracted to the burned area and spend most of their grazing time in that portion of the pasture.  As fire moves around the pasture or landscape, grazing pressure will also change in synchrony.  The focal area or patch will incurr heavy grazing creating a grazing lawn type structure.  As grazing pressure is released, the plant community recovers and a shift mosaic is created. 

Patch burning allows livestock to freely select the most recently burned part of a pasture. It has been found that livestock spend 75% of their time on these burned patches and, typically, evenly utilize all the palatable plants within the entire burned patch. This includes plants that are normally not considered desirable livestock forage. Then within 6-12 months another portion of the pasture can be burned. This will shift the focal grazing point to the new burn patch. After the heavy utilization (1 to 4 years post-burn depending on the chosen rotation) a transition state of bare ground, forbs, and small amounts of standing biomass and litter occurs. Within a couple of years post-burn, the patch receives very little grazing pressure which allows biomass and litter to accumulate (Figure 3). This rested patch is then ready to be burned and grazed again. This is all accomplished without fences. The total amount of hands on management is much less with this system than many other common grazing systems.  For more information about patch burning go to the following link http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-4677/E-998survey.pdf 

 
Patch burning (patch-burn grazing) is the purposeful grazing of a section of an landscape or management unit that has been prescribed burned, and then rotating fire through the managment unit to move the grazing pressure over time. This creates a shifting mosaic on the landscape or management unit.

 

 

Cattle spend 75% of the time grazing on the most recently burned patches. This allows the other patches to recover.

 

Prescribed Fire Associations

Land managers across the country often have four primary reasons why they do not use prescribed fire which are: liability, limited training or experience with fire, the need for labor, and lack of equipment. All of these reasons can be addressed by forming or joining a prescribed burning association.

A prescribed burn association is where a group of landowners form a partnership in an area to pool their labor and equipment to conduct prescribed burns on each other’s land. If there is not a burn association nearby, the best way to form one is to call a meeting of interested people and involve key members of the community (landowners, lessees, cooperative extension, state and federal land management agencies, and local fire departments). Next, pick a leader.  This should be a local land owner/manager because this should be a locally led grass roots organization. Then determine the area of operation of the association, which can be an entire county, multiple counties or just focused around a community. Next, set some goals and work to achieve them. Many burn associations have been able to receive grants to purchase equipment and pay for training opportunities.

Currently there are 53 prescribed burn associations across the nation in eight states. These locally-led associations are safely and effectively using prescribed fire to manage their lands, not only for their benefit, but for the benefit of all the people around them. For more information about forming prescribed burn associations’ check out the following publications:

Prescribed Fire Associations http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-2819/NREM-2880web.pdf

Prescribed Burning Associations in Texas http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_br_w7000_1019.pdf

When is the Best Time of Year to Conduct Prescribed Burns?

One of the main questions many land owners and fire managers often ask about prescribed burning is when is the best time of year to burn? This will vary depending upon specific land management goals. Timing will also depend upon when the burn can be accomplished safely and under favorable weather conditions. When planning prescribed burns it is important for fire managers to know and understand how many days are actually available during a specific season or over the entire year. Knowing this will allow fire managers to plan for and execute a predetermined number of burns during a given year. It can also aid in determining in which season or seasons it may be best to conduct their burns.

Limited Number of Burn Days

Most fire managers have several prescribed fires to conduct during a specific burn season, and if an adequate number of days are not available, some burns will not be conducted that year. Burns not conducted are usually postponed until the next year, adding more burns and needed burn days to an already limited schedule the following year. It can also drastically change management plans on that par­ticular burn unit. More often than not, many burn units are not burned regularly or at all because of a limited number of burn days due to restricting burning during a traditional burn season. This can negatively impact resources in numerous ways, along with creating an increased work load and cost on fire managers trying to implement prescribed burns.

Because of the limited number of burn days, a fire manger may try to burn when conditions are marginal. This can result in a prescribed fire that is not as effective as it should be causing manage­ment goals to not be met. On the other hand, safety may be compromised when prescribed burns are performed under marginal or less than desired conditions because of the need to complete all of the planned burns during that traditional time frame. If prescribed fires were conducted year-round, then more days would be available for burning, and the most optimum days for achieving goals and safety could be used.

Weather Variables

Weather has a major impact on prescribed fires and associated fire behavior. Therefore, the number of days available to burn each year is constrained by weather variables such as: temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity. Achieving the prescribed set of weather conditions during a particular time of the year has always been a dilemma faced by fire managers. If the goals of the prescribed burn are not extremely specific and safety concerns are maintained, then a wide range of conditions can be used for temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. Often, a narrow window of weather parameters is required due to safety issues, policy, and regulation, which will reduce the number of available burn days.

Even if weather conditions can be met, timing of the prescribed burn is often limited to a single season by policy, tradition, or a lack of understanding of fire effects. Again, this limits the number of available days left to conduct prescribed burns. Remember that historically, fires occur throughout North America at any time of the year. Records show that fires set by Native Americans occurred in nearly all months, with a majority in the late summer. Also a majority of the lightning-caused fires in many regions of the United States occur during the growing season. In many areas burn season is late winter to early spring to correspond with green-up for livestock production, which also coincides with highly variable and changing weather conditions. However,  conditions during the later winter can be favorable for wildfires which will further limit to the number of available burn days.

Limiting burning to a single season will continue to severely limit the application of prescribed fire in many areas. Also the lack understanding fire affects on native plant communities will also reduce the seasonal opportunities for conducting prescribed burns.

There are several publications and videos available that can assist fire managers to better understand fire prescriptions, fire effects and the best time to burn.

The Best Time of Year to Conduct Prescribed Burns http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-7504/NREM-2885web.pdf

Fire Effects in Native Plant Communities http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-2703/NREM-2877web.pdf

Fire Prescriptions for Native Plant Communities http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-2704/NREM-2878web.pdf

The Impact of Fire on the Landscape SunupTV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh7_onVw8PQ&feature=plcp

Prescribed Burning for Pasture Management SunupTV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jq0XAsWq8Ok&feature=plcp

Great Plains Fire Science Exchange: A Source for Fire Information

Although fire plays an important role in maintaining ecosystems in the Great Plains, managers, fire operations, private landowners, and researchers working with fire are often disconnected from each other.  The Great Plains Fire Science Exchange joins a nationwide network of regional consortia funded by the Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP).  The  vision behind this knowledge exchange is to build collaborative science delivery networks to accelerate the awareness, understanding, and adoption of wildland fire science information.  This approach will improve communication between researchers, fire managers, and private landowners.  The Great Plains Fire Science Exchange is focused on the mid-continent grassland resource that has a long evolutionary history of fire and grazing, with both working landscapes and conservation lands in public and private ownership settings.  The Exchange plans to increase the availability and application of fire science information for natural resource management and to serve as a conduit for on-the-land fire managers to share research needs with the scientific community.  Products created by the Great Plains FIre Exchange will be developed using feedback and suggestions directly from the Great Plains fire community.  We plan to achieve a more cohesive community of fire users by providing a web based clearinghouse for information, developing a network of demonstration sites, and a variety of research synthesis products. For more information find us on the web: at http://gpfirescience.org or on Facebook: at https://www.facebook.com/GPFireScience . We can also be contacted at GPFireScience@missouristate.edu.

 

Managing Firebreaks for Wildlife

Managing native vegetation with prescribed fire should be an integral part of any land management plan. Maintaining adequate firebreaks is necessary to implement a prescribed fire program. Firebreaks serve several functions, including defining the burn unit perimeter and providing access to burn units. However, they can also be used in other ways to benefit wildlife and improve hunting. Food plots are often used to attract wildlife and make various game species more visible and increase hunting success. In some cases, food plots can also provide beneficial forage for species such as wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).

Managing Herbaceous Cover

Firebreaks may be the only accessible and open areas for food plots. Firebreaks can be disked seasonally, annually, or every few years; thus, they can be used for annual or perennial, warm- or cool-season food plots. Perennial plantings are best suited for firebreaks around areas that are burned on a fire-return interval of >3 years. If the firebreak is planted in the season prior to burning, a “green” firebreak may provide suitable protection, depending on plant moisture, dead plant material, etc. Otherwise, firebreaks should be disked (optimally) or at least mowed just prior to burning. Thus, it is may be necessary to re-plant the firebreak after burning. 

Firebreaks do not have to be planted. They can be left fallow to allow native forbs to germinate. Often, native species such as sunflowers (Helianthus spp.), crotons (Croton spp.), and ragweeds (Ambrosia spp.) germinate in fallow firebreaks depending on the time of year they were disked. Fallow food plots, both in fields and in woods, can be very attractive to wildlife. When firebreaks occur in woods, it is not uncommon for woody species to sprout and grow in the firebreak. That’s OK. Browse and cover from low-growing woody plants are important sources of food and cover for several species, especially white-tailed deer and wild turkeys. Woody species can be kept in check by disking, mowing, or selective herbicides.

Firebreaks can be managed for both fallow vegetation and food plot forages. By creating a firebreak 2-disk-widths wide, one half (or side) can be planted and the other left fallow. This can be a very attractive arrangement, depending on what is planted and what the seedbank holds, for species such as cottontail rabbits and northern bobwhite.

Another strategy when creating firebreaks in areas where the seedbank is likely to hold undesirable species is to establish the firebreak the width of a sprayer, not the width of a disk. This allows the use of selective herbicides, whether the firebreak is managed with planted forages or for fallow vegetation.

 

This firebreak has been planted to oats to provide additional forage during the cool season. The extra width aids in controlling prescribed fires within the adjacent pine stand while allowing adequate sunlight for the food plot.

This food plot was created by disking a firebreak. Notice the sunflower, croton (dove weed), and ragweed which provides forage for white-tailed deer and seed for mourning dove and Northern bobwhite.

A Statewide Burn Association in Oklahoma

The vision for statewide burn association came from results of a series of statewide meetings and surveys filled out by landowners. One of the main questions the survey asked was if landowners would like a statewide organization to assist with finding affordable prescribed fire liability insurance. The response was overwhelming, with over 900 people attending the meetings across the state, and filling out over 500 surveys.

From this, the OPBA was started with a board of directors developing and approving bylaws and an operating handbook. They have also set up OPBA to operate as a 501(3)c not-for-profit organization. The most important activities the group has undertaken is applying for grants and soliciting other groups for funds to provide OPBA and its associated PBA’s with an executive director to oversee operations, funding for training, equipment, and other educational programs. The Oklahoma chapter of The Nature Conservancy was the first to assist by providing funding to allow OPBA to begin operations. Further, the Oklahoma Conservation Commission, through a grant from the US Fish and Wildlife Service Partners Program, and the Oklahoma NRCS has provided funds for training of local prescribed burn association members and the development of an online training course. Recently, the Noble Foundation has offered to provide a large donation to OPBA through in-kind services, which will greatly enhance its operation.

OPBA has also been working with other groups, as well as an insurance broker from Oklahoma, to find and provide PBA’s with effective and affordable prescribed fire liability insurance. This has proven to be a challenge, but one that the OPBA members and partners believe can be overcome through this statewide alliance. This activity has also caught the attention of neighboring states that are closely watching Oklahoma’s statewide effort. Thus, OPBA members recently took part in a regional meeting to determine if there was a need for states to work with each other on prescribed fire issues. This meeting showed that all the states had very similar problems and issues, and that working together may be the best way to overcome obstacles that make implementing prescribed fire difficult. Also, the establishment of a regional group could make prescribed fire liability insurance more cost effective for all groups involved. The OPBA is going to continue to pursue funds to solidify its existence and work to promote prescribed fire in Oklahoma and the region. The need for statewide organization to bring all the burn associations together and assist them with training and finding equipment is very important and OPBA will work to help Oklahoma’s landowners achieve their land management goals.

Minimizing Mortality to Wildlife from Prescribed Fire

For most wildlife species, mortality from prescribed fire is small. Some species of reptiles such as this Western glass lizard appear to be more susceptible to mortality. However, failure to use fire will eventually result in the plant community being insufficient for these same species. Thus, some level of wildlife mortality is necessary to sustain the populations that are dependent on these fire adapted plant communities.

Prescribed fire is an important wildlife management practice that influences the structure and composition of plant communities.  This influences wildlife distribution and abundance across the landscape.  However, there are some concerns to consider when using prescribed fire, such as direct wildlife mortality.  While direct mortality is rare, there are some things that can be considered to minimize its occurrence.  However, the overall positive effects of fire outweigh any potential negatives in most instances.

While the vast majority of wildlife are able to avoid fire (either by escaping the burn unit or going underground), young wildlife will be particularly vulnerable.  Limited information exists on how much mortality fires cause, but it appears to be minimal in areas where fire historically occurred.  Ground nesting birds are susceptible to fire and this has long been recognized. However, limited research suggests that loses to ground nesting birds from fires conducted during the nesting season is minimal.  Yet, avoiding the primarily nesting period is advisable when possible, assuming the land manager can still maintain the appropriate fire frequency. 

For most of the U.S., the primary nesting season for grassland birds is May-July.  While there is still reproduction taking place during August and September, the vast majority of nests are complete by this time.  Therefore, waiting until late July or August will avoid most chick mortality. Additionally, many bird species will renest if their first nest is lost to a fire.  Similarly, May and June have high numbers of deer fawns and young rabbits.  Reptiles are also at risk during early spring.  They are not as mobile as mammals and birds, and are more frequently killed by fire right after they come out of hibernation.  Some species in particular have shown high mortality rates such as glass lizards.  Reptiles and amphibians are most active during the summer months.  Summer fires often leave a refugia of unburned area that reptiles and small mammals may be able to escape to. However, it has been concluded that a landscape with a mosaic of burned and unburned areas has a higher diversity of reptile species.  Thus, while some reptile and amphibian mortality will occur, providing a diversity of plant composition and structure with fire would be beneficial in the long-term to the reptile and amphibian community as a whole.  Therefore, only a portion of the landscape should be burned each year.  This will also ensure that all species have the habitat requirements needed in that year.  

While it is impossible to avoid wildlife mortality from prescribed fire, steps can be taken to reduce the incidence.  However, as mentioned earlier, maintaining the appropriate plant community for a species is much more critical than individual incidental mortality.  Thus, fire frequency must be the overriding factor for proper wildlife management.

 

 

Utilizing Prescribed Fire to Create “Food Plots”

Land managers often wish to plant food plots to increase forage or serve as an attractant for wildlife. At times this may be a beneficial practice, particularly as an attractant for hunting.  An alternative is to use prescribed fire to stimulate food producing native plants. Depending on the soil type, location, season of year, and precipitation, prescribed fires often stimulate plants that are utilized by wildlife.

Growing Season Fire

Growing season fires can be especially productive for creating food plots for mourning dove hunting, this favors several species of desirable food plants such as snow-on-the-mountain, croton or dove weed, and sunflower, as well as creates ample bare ground to allow doves to forage. These plants are also desirable for Northern bobwhite, ring-necked pheasant, and wild turkey.  Additionally, late summer or early fall fires reduce grass litter going into the dormant season which can make certain important cool season plants more accessible. Scribner’s panicum, which is important winter deer forage in many areas, is a good example. This plant is commonly foraged on by white-tailed deer during the winter in areas that were burned during the previous growing-season.

Dormant Season Fire

Dormant season fires can be equally important.  Wild turkey in particular are attracted to areas that were burned in later winter or early spring as they have actively growing grasses for the first few weeks following the fire.  Later as annual forbs (broadleaf herbaceous plants) increase in abundance the area become important for insect production for hens and poults. These same forbs will have seeds later in the summer and into the fall that wild turkey feed on.  White-tailed deer will utilize many of these same forbs as forage.  Further, burned areas that contain woody plants will have abundant resprouts that offer excellent browse for white-tailed deer.  Plants such as greenbrier, elm, and blackberry are particularly attractive following a fire.

Final Considerations

While, these native “food plots” may not produce the quantity of forage per acre that a cultivated plot would, the cost is much less per acre, thus many more acres can be treated maximizing the benefit to wildlife. Land managers will not see the same results from year to year or place to place as weather and soil differences will influence the outcomes. Experimentation with various seasons of burns on a particular property will provide the manager guidance as to how to increase the attractiveness of a site to target wildlife. The important thing to remember is that you can successfully manage for wildlife without planting anything on your property. This requires an understanding of how to manipulate native plants with disturbances such as fire.  To be successful with this type of management, it is imperative to learn to identify key plants that wildlife utilize.

Prescribed fire can create natural food plots at little cost to the landowner. These white-tailed deer are concentrated on a fire that was conducted in July, the photo was taken the following January. The deer are feeding on the winter rosettes of Scribner’s panicum which is a native cool season perennial grass.